Section 1. 06 Regulations of NHPAskip specific nav links. Home. Working with Section 1. Department Of Interior Nepa Regulations' title='Department Of Interior Nepa Regulations' />Welcome The California Office of Historic Preservation OHP invites you to join us in preserving, protecting, and honoring the cultural, historical, and. Downloadable pdf versions of lawsuit complaints regarding personal injury, patent and trademark infringement, environmental actions, and libelslander. The NEPA Program Area provides guidance, policies, and examples of federal regulations and Agency policies for the implementation of NEPA, including the development. The Washington State Environmental Policy Act SEPA provides a way to identify possible environmental impacts that may result from governmental decisions. Section 106 Regulations SectionbySection Questions and Answers. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR. Based on a recent analysis and review of data available that showed that future mining is not a significant threat to sage grouse. Revised Section 106 Regulations, Final Rule Preamble Effective January 11, 2001. Users Guide. Section 1. Regulations Section 1. Regulations Preamble. Revised Section 1. Regulations, Final Rule PreambleEffective January 1. Also available with the text of the regulations 4. Adobe Acrobat PDF formatWhat follows is the preamble to the revised Section 1. DOE emergency response efforts provide clear and consistent communication to deliver situational awareness of energy sector impacts. DOE responders in the field will. Plans-in-Development_Wyoming_CCSM_0.jpg' alt='Department Of Interior Nepa Regulations' title='Department Of Interior Nepa Regulations' />CFR Part 8. Protection of Historic Properties Final Rule. Agency Advisory Council on Historic Preservation. Action Final rule revision of current regulations. Summary, Dates, and Contact Information. Supplementary Information. Background. Highlights of Changes. Response to Public Comments. Description of Meaning and Intent of Specific Sections. Impact Analysis. List of Subjects in 3. CFR Part 8. 00. Summary The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation is publishing. National Historic Preservation Act NHPA, and. Administrations reinventing government initiatives and public comment. Litigation earlier this year challenged that previous rule. This. rulemaking has addressed questions and concerns raised by that. The final rule modifies the process by which Federal agencies consider. Council with a reasonable opportunity to comment with regard to. NHPA. The Council. Federal agencies, State. Historic Preservation Officers SHPOs, Tribal Historic Preservation. Officers THPOs, Native Americans and Native Hawaiians, industry, and. Dates This final rule is effective January 1. For further information, contact If you have questions about the. Frances Gilmore or Artisha Thompson at the. When. calling or sending e mail, please state your name, affiliation, and. Informational materials about the new. Web site www. achp. Supplementary Information The information that follows has been. The first one provides background. The second section highlights the changes. The third section describes, by. Councils response to public comments on this. The fourth section provides a description of the meaning. Finally, the. fifth section provides the impact analysis section, which addresses. Regulatory Flexibility Act. Paperwork Reduction Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the. Unfunded Mandates Act, the Congressional Review Act and various. Executive Orders. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Council is the. Government in the field of historic. Twenty members make up the Council. The President. appoints four members of the general public, one Native American or. Native Hawaiian, four historic preservation experts, and one governor. The Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of. Agriculture, four other Federal agency heads designated by the. President, the Architect of the Capitol, the chairman of the National. Trust for Historic Preservation and the president of the National. Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers complete the. This final rule sets forth the revised section 1. Section. 1. 06 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1. U. S. C. 4. 70f NHPA, requires Federal agencies to take into account the. National Register of Historic Places and to afford the. Council a reasonable opportunity to comment on such undertakings. Through Section 2. National Historic Preservation Act, the. Council is authorized to promulgate such rules and regulations as it. After publishing two Notices of Proposed Rulemaking 5. FR 5. 03. 96. October 3, 1. FR 4. 85. 80, September 1. Council. published a final rule setting forth a revised process implementing. FR 2. 70. 44 2. 70. May 1. 8, 1. 99. 9. Such. rule went into effect on June 1. Two major forces behind that revision process were the 1. National Historic Preservation Act NHPA, and the. Administrations reinventing government efforts. In October, 1. 99. Public Law 1. 02 5. NHPA and affected the way section 1. Among other things, the 1. Clarified that properties of traditional religious and. Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian organization. National. Register. U. S. C. 4. 70ad6A. Required that in carrying out its responsibilities under. Federal agency shall consult with any Indian tribe or. Native Hawaiian organization that attaches religious and cultural. U. S. C. 4. 70ad6B. Also see 3. 6 CFR 8. Native Hawaiian. organizations, consulting party status in the section 1. Implementation of this statutory consultation requirement is found. See, for example, 3. CFR 8. 00. 3f2. Added a provision in the NHPA prohibiting Federal agencies from. In such. cases, the Federal agency can only grant the license or assistance if. Council, that circumstances. U. S. C. 4. 70h 2k. See 3. 6 CFR 8. 00. Explicitly recognized the long standing practice of having. Federal agencies develop agreements to address adverse effects of their. This practice had also been. Section 2. 05b of the. NHPA was changed to state that the Council could be represented in. General Counsel regarding enforcement of agreements with. Federal agencies. It also clarified that where such an agreement is. Federal agency must document his. Windows Fundamentals For Legacy Pcs Product Key. Such agency head cannot delegate. It also provided that agreements executed pursuant. Federal. undertaking and all its parts. U. S. C. 4. 70h 2l. See 3. 6 CFR 8. 00. Added a member to the Council. This Council member would be a. Native American or Native Hawaiian appointed by the President. U. S. C. 6. Explicitly clarified the fact that the Council has authority to. Act in its entirety. U. S. C. 4. 70s emphasis added highlighted text was added by the 1. Amended the definition of the term undertaking, by adding. State or local. regulation administered pursuant to a delegation or approval by a. Federal agency to the list of actions constituting an. U. S. C. 4. 70w7D. The amended, statutory. CFR. Additionally, as part of the Administrations National Performance. Review and overall regulatory streamlining efforts, the Council. Administration. A description of. Councils revision efforts from 1. FR 2. 70. 44 2. 70. May 1. 8, 1. 99. 9. That preamble extensively details. On February 1. 5, 2. National Mining Association NMA. Among other things, the. Appointments Clause of the. Constitution and certain provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act. After assessing the allegations contained in. Council decided to move forward with the present. The. Council believed that this rulemaking would provide an opportunity to. National. Trust for Historic Preservation Trust and the National Conference. State Historic Preservation Officers NCSHPO, as Council. It would also give. This rulemaking does not. Council agreement with the merits of the allegations but. Councils desire to remove these issues from litigation. Accordingly, at the June 2. Council meeting in Maine, the. Chairman of the Council asked the Council members to take two actions. The first action was a new vote on the adoption of the 1. Trust and NCSHPO. The Council members. Trust and NCSHPO. The second action was a vote on undertaking the present rulemaking. Again. the Council members voted in favor of moving forward with the. Trust and NCSHPO voluntarily. Accordingly, on July 1. Council published a proposed rule for. FR 4. 28. 33 4. 28. The public was given a 3. August 1. 0, in which to. All those who filed a timely request for. August 3. 1 to submit. We believe the extension granted was reasonable in. As stated above, the text of the proposed rule submitted for public. That final rule, in turn, was the product. The preamble of that. FR 2. 70. 44 2. 70. May 1. 8, 1. 99. 9 extensively. It is a lengthy document and will not be re printed here. After the close of the public comment period, the Council, minus. Trust and NCSHPO, considered the comments and incorporated changes. On November 1. 7, 2. Council voted on whether to adopt the draft rule as a final rule. As. stated before, the Council members representing the Trust and NCSHPO. They accordingly removed themselves from the table and took. The Council voted to adopt the draft rule as the final rule now. The Council reiterates that the Trust and NCSHPO did not. Council activities regarding this rulemaking. Programs Planning and NEPA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENTPlanning and NEPA in the BLMThe Bureau of Land Management manages more than 2. Americas public lands and roughly 7. We believe partnerships and inclusion are vital to managing sustainable, working public lands. This means respecting the ties that communities have to public lands, and welcoming and valuing diverse views. We are proud of our strong record of taking local voice into account. To guide our efforts, we develop Resource Management Plans RMPs that serve as blueprints to keep public landscapes healthy and productive. Our RMPs encompass highly varied terrain, from Alaskas North Slope, to Californias Mojave Desert, to the open space surrounding many rapidly growing western cities. View our featured plans in development and plans in effect.